This gives a proper view of the volume-trend: https://neven1.typepad.com/.a/6a0133f03a1e37970b0240a4629fad200c-800wi. PIOMAS Mean Sea Ice Motion (left) and anomaly relative to 2011-2018 for January through June 2020. May was the 10th COLDEST May in the satellite record. Reply. Arctic Sea Ice Thickness. The data is based on DMI… Fig.3 Monthly Sea Ice Volume from PIOMAS for April and Sep. From these validation studies we arrive at conservative estimates of the uncertainty in the trend of  ± 1.0 103 km3/decade. Average September  2020 ice volume falls on the trend line. These data have been reprocessed and are now available as version 2.1. University of Washington . This is of course the exact opposite of what fraudsters at National Geographic and Newsweek are claiming. Thick sea ice is blocking both the Northern Sea Route and Northwest Passage. Polar Science Center . PIOMAS gridded thickness from Wipneus on the Arctic Sea Ice Forum: CryoSat-2 near real time Arctic sea ice thickness Now that the Arctic melt season has started in earnest, we find a surprising trend. Time Series of CryoSat-2/SMOS  multi-sensor analysis (AWI/ESA)  and PIOMAS Sea  Ice Volume Anomaly for March. If you would like to support our research, education, and outreach activities through a personal gift, please talk to us or you can make a donation online. The figures are based on calculations using DMI’s operational ocean and sea ice model HYCOM-CICE. The blue line represents the trend calculated from January 1 1979 to the most recent date indicated on the figure. Also above 2005 and … Animations and daily updates of sea ice thickness and volume. Updates will be generated at approximately one-month intervals. It is not data. Plotting the data from DMI in the link you provided shows a clearly decrease in the ice volume. Our comparisons with data and alternate model runs indicate that this new trend is a conservative estimate of the actual trend. PIOMAS Annually Averaged Sea Ice Volume. It depends on both ice thickness and extent and therefore more directly tied to climate forcing than extent alone. The first week of summer has been marked by heavy snowfall in the Russian cities of Salekhard and Labytnangi. Seattle, WA 98105-6698, Voice: 206-543-6613 . As the above chart shows, the ice has in reality even grown a bit! New with this version we provide uncertainty statistics. Monthly ice volume was 74% below the maximum in … The trend for the period 1979- present  is shown in blue. Differences in ice volume are up to 11% greater in late spring. Do you have data showing ice is melting. Fig.1  Arctic sea ice volume anomaly from PIOMAS updated once a month. Consider them targets to be shot at with real data and facts. Climate Change Emergency is making a joke out of science and eroding people’s confidence in it. When model upgrades occur, the entire time series will be reprocessed and posted. The ice is innocent of that until proven guilty. meanwhile we have wittering fools daily wailing about worlds end in 10 yrs or so. Atmospheric information to drive the model, specifically wind, surface air temperature, and cloud cover to compute solar and long wave radiation are specified from the NCEP/NCAR reanalysis. Fig. The Polar Science Center is a group of dedicated investigators conducting interdisciplinary research on the oceanography, climatology, meteorology, biology and ecology of the ice-covered regions on Earth and elsewhere in the solar system. 2008 2018. More details can be found in Schweiger et al. Tracking down such a small difference in energy is very difficult, and underscores why we need to look at longer time series and consider the uncertainties in our measurements and calculations. Winter will not let go in the North ( Norwegian Weather Service. ... DMI, GEUS and DTU are responsible for the content of the site. Box 355640 . Wish it were true, but wishes don’t make a thing true. https://www.nrk.no/finnmark/vinteren-vil-ikke-gi-slip-in-nord-1.14582711. Arctic sea ice volume has not fallen in 13 years. Cryosat agrees more with DMI at this time in that it shows that the volume is near or at an all time low, unlike PIOMAS. La Prossima Era Glaciale     Available here. The average thickness is calculated for the PIOMAS domain by only including locations where ice is thicker than .15 m. Fig 6. It was the coldest May ever in Arizona and was capped off by accumulating snow in Flagstaff on Memorial Day. Four of the five slowest melt years have occurred during the last five years. ... And the DMI Volume is calculated using their model. At the end of May, Arctic sea ice daily extent stood at second lowest in the 40-year satellite record.”. I wonder how many other agencies have been infiltrated with manipulators? https://nsidc.org/arcticseaicenews/ Now available Additional information on PIOMAS can be found (here), A comprehensive library of sea ice thickness data for model validation has been compiled and is available (here). Model improvement is an ongoing research activity at PSC and model upgrades may occur at irregular intervals. PIOMAS has been extensively validated through comparisons with observations from US-Navy submarines, oceanographic moorings, and satellites. spike55 says: January 30, 2020 at 6:32 am. The Polar Science Center is entirely funded through grants and contracts from federal and state agencies and private foundations. September 2020v volume falls on the lower end of the spectrum of recent years (Fig 4.) Applied Physics Laboratory . The uncertainty of the  monthly averaged ice volume anomaly is estimated as ±0.75  103 km3. NISDC no longer uses the standard deviation from the mean so they can make it appear as though recently there has been even additional melting. Login with username, password and session length, Support the Arctic Sea Ice Forum and Blog, SHARKS (CROSSED OUT) MONGEESE (SIC) WITH FRICKIN LASER BEAMS ATTACHED TO THEIR HEADS, Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one - Albert Einstein, I contacted an expert from PIOMAS in regards to the differences between DMI and PIOMAS. Maybe that’s because the land ice is melting. Instead of shrinking rapidly — as is often claimed by global warming alarmists and the click-sleaze media — Arctic sea-ice volume has not shrunk in 13 years! This energy comes from the change in the distribution of solar radiation as the earth rotates around the sun. Sea ice volume is an important climate indicator. 2011. The figure shows the mean temperature of the sea ice and the surface of the sea based on satellite observations during the past 36 hours. That’s a nice chart derived from a model. https://sputniknews.com/russia/201906061075687029-snow-in-june-russia-summer/ Fig 9. Right now, what they have in DMI is the Arctic Sea Ice Volume, which I believe in the future, will also just magically disappear. Monthly  ice volume was 74% below the maximum in 1979 and 59% below the mean value for 1979-2019. Data source: Danish Meteorological Institute (DMI). Thicker than normal ice in the Barents Sea that was present in previous months is nearly gone. Average Arctic sea ice volume in September 2020 was 4,300 km3. 2019 finished with an annually averaged sea ice volume that was the 2nd  lowest on record with 13,500 km 3 ,  about 600 km 3 above the 2017 record with very similar volume numbers for recent low annual volume years  (2011,2012,2016, 2017). Quote from: Neven on February 28, 2018, 03:18:53 PM, Quote from: Richard Rathbone on May 01, 2020, 03:16:13 PM, Quote from: Phoenix on May 01, 2020, 01:03:33 AM, Quote from: PragmaticAntithesis on May 06, 2020, 08:40:49 PM, http://polarportal.dk/en/sea-ice-and-icebergs/sea-ice-thickness-and-volume/, http://greatwhitecon.info/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/NRT-Vol-2020-04-15B.png, http://www.cpom.ucl.ac.uk/csopr/science.html, http://psc.apl.uw.edu/research/projects/arctic-sea-ice-volume-anomaly/validation/, http://psc.apl.washington.edu/sea_ice_cdr/, Quote from: grixm on May 07, 2020, 03:06:16 PM, Quote from: Richard Rathbone on May 07, 2020, 04:07:02 PM, http://ocean.dmi.dk/arctic/icethickness/icetext.uk.php, https://github.com/CICE-Consortium/CICE/wiki/CICE-Version-Index. Daily Sea Ice volume anomalies for each day are computed relative to the 1979 to 2019 average for that day of the year. Arctic sea ice. There is no doubt that there is less ice than existed from 1980 to 2010, but that period is too short to mean anything. A strong negative ice thickness anomaly north of Greenland that developed in August persisted  and persisted through Septemmber. Thanks, Robert, Anyone who says we’re enduring “unprecedented global warming” is lying or woefully misinformed. https://nsidc.org/arcticseaicenews/charctic-interactive-sea-ice-graph/. Bullshit climate denier clickbait. So it takes about the 50 times the annual U.S. energy consumption to melt this much ice every year. CryoSat-2/SMOS (AWI/ESA) multi-sensor Sea  Ice Thickness Anomaly for April (up to April 15) 2020 relative to 2011-2018. eBook edition This is noteworthy as this area typically features some of the thickest ice in the Arctic and is termed the Last Ice Area (see here). Comparisons of the model estimates of the ice thickness with observations help test our understanding of the processes represented in the model that are important for sea ice formation and melt. PIOMAS sea ice advection anomaly relative to 2011-2018 for February 2020. Snow fell in Salekhard, the administrative centre of Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous Okrug, on the morning of 5 June for the second year in a row, Artem Koshkin, head of the Yamalo-Nenets Centre for Hydrometeorology and Environmental Monitoring, told reporters. Weather Rev., 131, 845-861, 2003. You clearly do have an agenda behind the post and reluctant to post all the available data and information? Fig  5. Early sea ice retreat in the Bering Sea extended into the southern Chukchi Sea. Here is what he had to say. Sea Ice Volume is calculated using the Pan-Arctic Ice Ocean Modeling and Assimilation System (PIOMAS, Zhang and Rothrock, 2003) developed at APL/PSC. Good news!A publisher in Italy has translated Not by Fire but by Ice into Italian. DMI recent Arctic sea ice extent and thickness. Anomalies for each day are calculated relative to the average over the 1979 -2016 period for that day of the year to remove the annual cycle. Consider switching to Theme Exodus! This time series of ice volume is generated with an updated version of PIOMAS (June-15,2011). Merged CryoSat-2/SMOS thickness data from the Finnish Meteorological Institute: AMSR2 thickness and melt concentration from the Arctic Data Archive System. However,  Arctic sea ice volume cannot currently be observed continuously.